Abstract

The use of intranasal oxytocin (OT) in research has become increasingly important over the past decade. Although researchers have acknowledged a need for further investigation of the physiological effects of intranasal administration, few studies have actually done so. In the present double-blind cross-over study we investigated the longevity of a single 24 IU dose of intranasal OT measured in saliva in 40 healthy adult males. Salivary OT concentrations were significantly higher in the OT condition, compared to placebo. This significant difference lasted until the end of testing, approximately 108 minutes after administration, and peaked at 30 minutes. Results showed significant individual differences in response to intranasal OT administration. To our knowledge this is the largest and first all-male within-subjects design study to demonstrate the impact of intranasal OT on salivary OT concentrations. The results are consistent with previous research in suggesting that salivary OT is a valid matrix for OT measurement. The results also suggest that the post-administration ‘wait-time’ prior to starting experimental tasks could be reduced to 30 minutes, from the 45 minutes typically used, thereby enabling testing during peak OT concentrations. Further research is needed to ascertain whether OT concentrations after intranasal administration follow similar patterns in females, and different age groups.

Highlights

  • The use of intranasal oxytocin (IN-OT) in scientific research has become increasingly popular over the past decade

  • The aim of the present study was to provide evidence that IN-OT has a significant impact on salivary OT concentrations in healthy adults, and the nature of this impact

  • We used non-parametric tests to assess whether there was a significant effect of drug on salivary OT concentrations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of intranasal oxytocin (IN-OT) in scientific research has become increasingly popular over the past decade. According to a recent review, 230 papers have reported using IN-OT since 1958 [1] This scientific interest spans several fields, from clinical psychology, with respect to autism spectrum disorder [2, 3] and schizophrenia [4], to social psychology, with respect to intergroup relationships [5] and emotional processing [6]. Despite this flourishing interest, concern has been expressed that the assumptions upon which this line of research.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call