Abstract
ABSTRACT Using examples from West Africa, this paper argues that Salafism has become modular. In interrelated trends, some Salafis have revised their postures towards other Muslims, while some non-Salafis selectively adopt elements of Salafism; both trends lead to forms of ‘post-Salafism’. The paper investigates three facets of these nascent ‘post-Salafi’ trends. First, Salafis have championed the hadith report as the main currency of evidence-giving in religious debate, but have lost ‘market share’ in the interpretation of hadith. Second, intellectuals trained in comparative jurisprudence can stake out an appealing middle ground between Salafism and traditionalism. Third, Salafis’ need for coalition partners in politics and society can blur the boundaries of Salafism, even to the point that some Salafis compromise on anti-Sufism, a core element of Salafism. Discussing Nigeria, Mauritania, and Mali, the paper highlights how local contextual factors have affected the construction of Muslim identity since the 1990s. These factors include democratic openings, exhaustion with Sufi-Salafi polemics, the appeal of Shi‘ism, and mass protests with religious colourations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
