Abstract
This article examines the surprising revival of dissident principles and dissident modes of protest in the Russian opposition during the Putin‐Medvedev “tandemocracy” (2008–12). Its focus is “Strategy‐31,” a campaign of civil disobedience instigated by the radical activist Eduard Limonov. The first part of this article seeks to demonstrate how Strategy‐31 employed what Charles Tilly terms a “repertoire of contention,” a set of performed actions and discursive practices, which had been inherited from the dissident rights‐defenders. This repertoire both mimicked and transformed the dissidents” traditional forms of activism. By employing this repertoire and by explicitly identifying dissidents as his precursors, Limonov legitimised Strategy‐31 and made it easier for his political rivals and ideological adversaries to join him in a common endeavor. The second part of this article shows how tensions within the dissident tradition contributed to the breakdown of the coalition of radicals and rights‐defenders at the core of Strategy‐31. To bolster his credibility as a crusader for constitutional rights, Limonov had courted the support of Lyudmila Alekseeva, a veteran dissident who headed the Moscow Helsinki Group. By joining Limonov as an applicant for Strategy‐31, Alekseeva became a living link between its demonstrations and those of its dissident precursors. But Alekseeva and Limonov differed profoundly in their motives and their goals. These differences, which were skilfully exploited by the authorities, ultimately led to the collapse of Strategy‐31.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.