Abstract

One of the most important developments in Hinduism in the Common Era has been the rise of devotionalism or bhakti. Though theologians and others have contributed to this development, the primary motive force behind it has been poets, who have composed songs celebrating their love for God, and sometimes lamenting their distance from Her. From early in their history, bhakti traditions have praised not only the various gods, but also the devotional poets as well. And so hagiographies have been written about the lives of those exceptional devotees. It could be argued that we find the religious experience of these devotees in their own compositions and in these hagiographies. This article will raise questions about the reliability of our access to the poets’ religious experience through these sources, taking as a test case the seventeenth century devotional poet Tukaram and the hagiographer Mahipati. Tukaram is a particularly apt case for a study of devotional poetry and hagiography as the means to access the religious experience of a Hindu saint, since scholars have argued that his works are unusual in the degree to which he reflects on his own life. We will see why, for reasons of textual history, and for more theoretical reasons, the experience of saints such as Tukaram must remain elusive.

Highlights

  • One of the most important developments in Hinduism in the Common Era has been the rise of devotionalism or bhakti

  • Hagiographies have been written about the lives of those exceptional devotees

  • It could be argued that we find the religious experience of these devotees in their own compositions and in these hagiographies

Read more

Summary

Encountering Saints through Hagiography

A recent book about the comparative study of hagiography includes an article about another. Contemporary devotees hope to obtain blessings by worshiping at this site, Mark McLaughlin says in this article, as they believe that Jnaneshvar is still present here This belief is illustrated strongly in an earlier century by a story that is told about yet a third Varkari saint, Eknath. The metaphysics of contemporary devotees are more capacious, or so McLaughlin argues In making this argument about presence, and even in invoking Robert Orsi, Mark McLaughlin is following the editors of the book in which his article appears. I believe that Monge is going beyond my earlier second-hand academic formulation that hagiographies recount things that believers take to be true, or that even believers take to be the Truth, but that they convey truth to the scholarly analyst as well As they make the case for a metaphysics of presence, both Mark McLaughlin and Rico Monge cite an article by Robert A. The section is about the problems with those sources, for Tukaram

Tukaram and His “Cantakerous Wife”
Findings
Religious Experience as a Problem
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.