Safety-oriented SFR core design: Methodology and application to transient bifurcations and stability maps analyses

Abstract

Within the framework of the Generation IV Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor (SFR) R&D program of CEA (French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission), a methodology is proposed to early consider safety requirement in the undergoing reactor design process. Before the use of mechanistic tools (CATHARE, SIMMER, EUROPLEXUS, etc.) whose input deck elaboration requires an advanced knowledge of the reactor design, the methodology proposed in this article involves several physical tools simulating phenomena likely to govern the choice of design parameters. These tools are mostly based on reduced order models (ROM), meaning that they mainly involve low-dimensional modelings (mostly 0D and 1D) that are validated versus experimental results. They are gathered in a platform that covers all kind of accidental phenomenology, from the initiator (pump trip, reactivity insertion, local flow blockages, etc.) until the reach of a stable and coolable state after corium relocation. Thus, enabling a large number of simulations in a reasonable computational time, this fast-running platform makes possible the characterization of some major accident transient bifurcations (such as boiling onset, boiling stabilization, primary power excursion, molten fuel vaporization, corium axial relocation in transfer tubes, etc.), in terms of probability of occurrence and of consequences on the transient evolution. It also enables to identify the main physical parameters causing the bifurcations in order to allow a straight feedback on the core design and to give some orientations for future R&D studies. In this article, a focus is firstly made on some scenario bifurcations to illustrate the platform capabilities. The boiling onset and possible reactor state stabilization are studied. The possibility of primary power excursion depending on the core design and the fuel vaporization possibilities are assessed. This platform is also of great help in order to rapidly compare several core designs when facing accidental transients. An example is given by comparing a CADOR core design to an ASTRID-like core design through flow stability maps in natural circulation conditions obtained by the fast-running tool platform. These applications demonstrate the efficiency of the presented methodology integrating safety at the very first design stages, and at facilitating the safety-oriented design of SFRs.