Abstract

This paper gives an account of two typical ways of thinking drawn on by process operators and crane operators on a Norwegian offshore platform in the North Sea as they interpret, negotiate and define situations as hazardous. The discretion required for definitions of situations as dangerous is also discussed. The data presented are a result of 14 formal, semi structured interviews as well as several informal talks with the leaders on the platform. The study presented in this paper is based on a modified version of the interpretive approach to culture in organizations inspired by Clifford Geertz, Mats Alvesson, Diane Vaughan and Anne Richter. It is labeled as a modified version because it centers on the work processes of the interviewees. It is concluded that the completely different work processes of the work groups seem to generate different hazard metaphors, ways of thinking and ideas about discernments.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.