Safety of heparin loading during endovascular embolization in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Abstract

ObjectiveOf the complications that can occur during endovascular surgery in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) patients, thromboembolism remains a particular challenge for many surgeons. Heparin has been widely used for its prevention, but it has not been able to eliminate concerns about bleeding. Therefore, in this study, we tried to determine the risk of rebleeding associated with heparin use. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the medical and surgical records of 109 patients that underwent endovascular embolization for a ruptured cerebral aneurysm at a single institution from 2010 to 2014. These patients were divided into two groups according to whether heparin was loaded or not, to determine the effect of heparin on rebleeding and to identify other risk factors of rebleeding. ResultsThis series included 40 men (36.7 %) and 69 women (63.3 %) of mean age 57.9 ± 14.8 years. In 80 patients (73.4 %), endovascular embolization was conducted using an intraoperative bolus of 5000 units of heparin, whereas in the other 29 (26.6 %) endovascular embolization was performed without an intraoperative heparin bolus. After procedures, 16 patients (14.7 %) experienced rebleeding and 2 (1.8 %) a thromboembolic event. Intraoperative heparin loading (OR 0.683 [95 % CI 0.199−2.338]) was not found to be related to postoperative rebleeding. Rather, logistic regression analysis showed preoperative modified Fisher grade (OR 2.037 [95 % CI 1.077−3.853]) and external ventricular drainage (OR 5.389 [95 % CI 1.171−24.801]) independently predicted rebleeding. ConclusionsHeparin loading during endovascular treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms did not affect rebleeding. We conclude heparin loading to prevent thromboembolism during endovascular treatment may be considered a good option in aSAH patients.