Safety of conservative management for non-stenotic culprit lesions in STEMI patients treated with a two-step reperfusion strategy: a SUPER-MIMI sub-study.

Abstract

In the observational SUPER-MIMI study, a minimalist immediate mechanical intervention (MIMI) technique-which involves restoring blood flow in the acute phase and postponing stenting-was shown to be safe and effective among patients with a high thrombotic burden after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aim to assess whether a non-stenting strategy after a SUPER-MIMI strategy was safe at 4-year follow-up in patients enrolled in the SUPER-MIMI study who were not stented. This prospective cohort study assessed the long-term outcomes of a subgroup of patients included in the SUPER-MIMI study. Among the 155 patients enrolled in the SUPER-MIMI study, 57 patients (36.8%) benefited from a conservative management (without stenting or balloon angioplasty) and were included in the current substudy. The mean duration of follow-up was 4.1±1.0 years. Four patients (7.0%) presented definite culprit lesion re-thrombosis, all of which occurred in the right coronary artery. The re-thrombosis rate appeared to be higher among patients with larger vessels: 2.9%, 8.3%, and 28.6% in arteries with diameters of 3-<4, 4-<5, and ≥5 mm, respectively. The overall rate of target lesion revascularization was 10.5%. There was one cardiac death and three rehospitalizations for heart failure. Overall, 82.5% of patients remained event free at a mean of 4.1±1.0 years. Conservative management of non-stenotic culprit lesions after a SUPER-MIMI strategy was associated with a high rate of re-thrombosis, particularly in patients with large coronary arteries.