Safety of Bisphosphonates in Moderate-to-Severe (Stage 3b-5) Chronic Kidney Disease: A Bi-National Cohort Analysis of 291,096 Patients from Spain and the United Kingdom

Abstract

Background: Although contraindicated in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to a lack of safety data, bisphosphonates are commonly used to prevent or treat bone fragility in these patients. We studied the safety of bisphosphonates in patients with moderate-to-severe CKD. Methods: Patients with stage 3b+ CKD based on 2+ estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measures were identified in two primary-care records databases, the UK CPRD GOLD during 1997-2016 and the Catalan (Spain) SIDIAP during 2007-2015. New bisphosphonate users were propensity-scorematched with up to five non-users to minimise confounding, and followed until treatment discontinuation, switching, dropout, death, or 10 years. The primary outcome was CKD stage worsening (eGFR decline or renal replacement therapy). Secondary outcomes included hospitalised acute kidney injury (AKI), gastrointestinal bleeding/ulcers (GIE), and hypocalcaemia. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox regression for SIDIAP participants, and sub-HRs (sHRs) calculated using Fine-Gray models for CPRD. Findings: We matched 2,447 bisphosphonate users with 8,931 non-users from CPRD, and 1,399 users with 6,547 non-users from SIDIAP. Bisphosphonate use was associated with greater risk of CKD progression in both CPRD (HR [95% CI]: 1·14 [1·04, 1·26]) and SIDIAP (HR: 1·16 [1·04, 1·29]). No statistically significant risk differences were found for AKI, GIE, or hypocalcaemia. Interpretation: A modest (10%-15%) increased risk of CKD progression was identified in association with bisphosphonate use amongst patients with moderate-severe disease. No other safety concerns were identified. Our findings should be considered in combination with effectiveness data before prescribing bisphosphonates to patients with moderate-severe CKD. Funding Statement: Funding was provided by the National Institute of Health Research Health Technology Assessment project number 14/36/02. The project was partially funded by CIBERFES, Instituto Carlos III, Spain. JP and MJP-S are supported by PI16/00619 (Spanish Ministry of Health ISCIII FIS-FEDER) and RD16/0009/0013 (ISCIII FEDER RedinRen). Declaration of Interests: B Abrahamsen reports research grants from UCB and Novartis. NK Arden reports personal fees from Flexion, Freshfields, Janssen, Merck, and Regeneron. C Cooper reports lecture fees and honoraria from the Alliance for Better Bone Health Amgen, Eli Lilly, GSK, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Servier, Takeda, and UCB. A Judge is a subpanel member of the NIHR PGfAR, has received consultancy fees from Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, and has held advisory board positions (which involved receipt of fees) at Anthera Pharmaceuticals, INC. MK Javaid reports research support and speaker fees from Amgen. D Prieto-Alhambra reports research grants from UCB, Amgen, and Les Laboratoires Servier, and departmental (not personal) speaker and consultancy fees from UCB and Amgen. D Prieto-Alhambra is a member of the NIHR HTA CET panel since November 2017. DE Robinson, MS Ali, VY Strauss, L Elhussein, Y Ben-Shlomo, F Caskey, D Dedman, and A Delmestri have nothing to disclose. Ethics Approval Statement: This study was approved by the CPRD Independent Scientific Advisory Committee (protocol number 15_ 53R2A).