Abstract

Background: Cigarette smoking, which poses significant health risks, is prevalent among vulnerable populations commonly treated by safety net providers. A large-scale implementation science project on specialty tobacco use treatment was launched within the Los Angeles County Health Agency. The first phase of this study seeks to summarize and compare smoking cessation treatment attitudes of providers at the Department of Health Services (DHS) and Department of Mental Health (DMH).Methods: In total, 467 safety net health care providers (DHS = 322; DMH = 145) completed a survey inquiring about attitudes on smoking cessation treatment consisting of locally developed items and those informed by a scale on readiness for organizational change. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were conducted to examine treatment attitudes for DHS and DMH providers.Results: Between agencies, providers largely reported similar attitudes on smoking cessation treatment and expressed positive beliefs regarding the efficacy of smoking cessation aids. Providers slightly or moderately agreed with being prepared to identify and diagnose tobacco use among patients. DMH providers stated that identification of tobacco use was less in line with their job responsibilities (p < 0.0001) and less strongly agreed that varenicline is effective for smoking cessation (p = 0.003), compared with DHS providers.Conclusions: Providers supported smoking cessation aid efficacy but may benefit from additional training on identification and treatment of tobacco use. These findings support the implementation of specialty tobacco cessation treatment programs with training on medications in safety net health care systems, which has the potential to yield large-scale public health benefits.

Highlights

  • Publicly-administered health agencies play a large role in the delivery of health services, including smoking cessation treatment, to populations who receive safety net medical care

  • Median survey item responses and agreement percentages for provider smoking cessation attitudes and beliefs across the Department of Health Services (DHS) and Department of Mental Health (DMH) agencies are presented in Tables 1, 2

  • Agency providers significantly differed on one smoking cessation belief, such that DMH providers less strongly agreed that varenicline is effective for smoking cessation than DHS providers, median responses (4 points) were consistent between agencies, W = 9082.5, p = 0.003; HodgesLehmann difference estimate 0.000019 [95% CI: 0.000016, 1.00]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publicly-administered health agencies play a large role in the delivery of health services, including smoking cessation treatment, to populations who receive safety net medical care. The Los Angeles County Health Agency is the second largest municipal health system in the nation, serving a diverse group of 750,000 patients annually [1] It consists of three serviceproviding entities, the Department of Health Services (DHS), the Department of Mental Health (DMH), and the Department of Public Health (DPH). Individuals at the greatest risk for developing a TUD in California are among those experiencing high levels of stress and racial discrimination, males, certain racial and ethnic groups, and those with lower education, income, employment, and rates of health insurance [4] This is consistent with a nationwide pattern, whereby cigarette smoking, due to a multitude of factors, is more prevalent among individuals with lower education, lower socioeconomic status, and mental illness [6,7,8,9].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call