Safety evaluation of centre line, edge line, and dual application rumble strips on Ontario two-lane rural roads

Abstract

The study builds on previous rumble strip safety evaluations by providing some Canadian-specific experience and in the process offering some definitive insights into differences in safety effects between installations on curved and tangent segments. An empirical Bayes before–after study estimated crash modification factors (CMFs) for installing edge line rumble strips (ELRS) and centerline rumble strips (CLRS), separately and in combination, on two-lane rural roads in Ontario. Separate CMFs were estimated for ELRS and CLRS for curved and tangent segments. The estimated CMFs indicate that rumble strips can be beneficial, except for CLRS on curved segments, and especially if applied in combination on tangents. The results also indicate that edge line and dual rumble strips are more effective on curved segments, so priority should be given to their application on such segments. It is noteworthy that dual application is more safety effective than either CLRS or ELRS, for tangents and overall.