Safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the illudofulvene drug CAP-0121.

Abstract

e15120 Background: Irofulven is an anticancer agent derived from illudin S initially investigated due to its unique mechanism of action and potential to overcome multi-drug resistance. This study investigates the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) and efficacy and safety of the second-generation drug, CAP-0121 (Califia Pharma). Methods: 24-hour comprehensive PK was performed at two different intravenous (IV) doses in canines for irofulven (0.2 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg; MTD) and CAP-0121 (1 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg). Plasma concentrations were measured by LC-MS/MS and PK parameters were calculated for both drugs using noncompartmental methods (Phoenix WinNonlin, version 8.4). PK parameters included area under the concentration vs time curve (AUC), maximum observed concentration (Cmax), clearance (CL), volume of distribution (Vd), and elimination half-life (t1/2). Canine chemistry/hematology/coagulation/urine panels, were measured across 28 days to ascertain the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Both platelet and neutrophil count reversibility was also assessed. Mice xenograft models implanted with a drug resistant human ovarian cancer (A2870), or a drug-resistant human metastatic lung cancer (MV522), were dosed with irofulven (9 mg/kg; MTD) and CAP-0121 (15, 20, and 25 mg/kg) and resulting tumor mass, % change in body weight, and platelet counts were compared relative to vehicle only. Results: Systemic exposure, CL, Vd, and t1/2 were similar between irofulven and CAP-0121 at a 1 mg/kg IV dose. For irofulven, AUC increased approximately proportionally at doses of 0.2 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg. For CAP-0121, exposure also increased proportionally at doses of 1 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg. MTD of CAP-0121 was found to be 3-fold higher in canines compared to irofulven as 3-fold more CAP-0121 was required to match the platelet reduction observed with irofulven; platelet and neutrophil nadir was rapidly reversible for CAP-0121. Canine nadir platelets and neutrophil counts were 3-fold higher for CAP-0121 vs irofulven at the same dose (1 mg/kg). There was no evidence of any canine systemic organ toxicity (gross, histologic, blood and urine analysis) for CAP-0121 at either dose. CAP-0121 was superior to irofulven (p < 0.02) with regards to final tumor weights in mice xenograft models, even though MTD was not reached for CAP-0121; a change in body weight and platelet loss was not observed for CAP-0121 at up 25 mg/kg in mice. With regards to in vitro anticancer cytotoxic activity, the two drug-resistant xenograft models confirm the superiority of CAP-0121 over irofulven. This study demonstrates that CAP-0121 has favorable PK parameters and a wider therapeutic window in humans compared to irofulven, emphasizing the potential anticancer utility of CAP-0121 for solid cancers without prolonged thrombocytopenia. Conclusions: Further investigation in clinical trials is warranted to confirm these preclinical observations.