Abstract

93 Background: The introduction of robotic systems to surgical oncology has allowed improved visualization with more precise manipulation of tissues. In esophageal cancer patients, this is crucial since most patients undergo neoadjuvant therapy (NT) prior to surgical resection. We report our initial experience in patients undergoing robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagogastrectomy (RAIL) for oncologic purposes at a large-referral center. Methods: A retrospective review of all consecutive patients undergoing RAIL from 2010-2011 was performed. Basic demographics such as age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) were recorded. Oncologic outcomes include tumor type, location, NT, post-operative tumor margins, and nodal harvest. Immediate 30-day postoperative complications were also recorded. Results: We identified 50 patients who under went RAIL with median age of 66 (42-82 years). The mean BMI was 28.6 ± 0.7, 67% of patients received NT and 54% had an ASA classification of 3. The mean and median number of lymph nodes retrieved during surgery was 20 ± 1.4 and 18.5 (8-63) respectively. R0 resections were achieved in all patients. The mean estimated blood loss was 146 ± 15 ml and there were no conversions to an open procedure. Postoperative complications occurred in 13 (26 %) of patients. Complications included atrial fibrillation 5 (10%), pneumonia 5 (10%), anastamotic leak 1 (2%), conduit staple line leak 1(2%), and chylous thorax 2 (4%). There were no wound infections documented. The median ICU stay and length of hospitalization (LOH) were 2 and 9 days respectively. Total mean operating time calculated from time of skin incision to wound closure was 453 ± 13 minutes. The mean operative time significantly decreased over time (first 23 cases 479 min vs. second 23 cases 428 min, p<0.05). Similarly the frequency of complications decreased significantly after 28 cases: 10 (35%) vs. 3 (13%) p=0.04. There were no in hospital mortalities. Conclusions: We demonstrated that RAIL for esophageal cancer can be performed safely with acceptable oncologic outcomes. RAIL may be associated with fewer complications after a learning curve, and shorter ICU stay and LOH.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call