Safety and healthcare resource utilisation in patients undergoing left-atrial appendage closure - A nationwide analysis

Abstract

Abstract Background Percutaneous left-atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has emerged as a non-pharmacological alternative for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) not suitable for anticoagulation therapy. Real-world data on peri-procedural outcomes are limited. Purpose To analyse outcomes of peri-procedural in-hospital safety and healthcare resource utilisation after percutaneous LAAC. Methods The US National Inpatient Sample was utilised to identify AF patients undergoing LAAC from 2016 to 2019. Primary outcomes (safety) were in-hospital stroke or systemic embolism (SE), pericardial effusion (PE), major bleeding, device embolisation and mortality. Secondary outcomes (resource utilisation) were adverse discharge disposition, hospital length of stay (LOS) and treatment costs. Logistic and Poisson regression models were used to analye outcomes by adjusting for 10 confounders. Results 11,240 adult patients (with 41.9% being female) with AF undergoing LAAC were included. SE decreased by 97% between 2016 and 2019 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0-0.24] (P=0.003), while a trend to lower numbers of other peri-procedural complications was determined. In-hospital mortality remained stable (0.14%). Hospital LOS decreased by 18% (0.78-0.87, P<0.001) and adverse discharge rate by 41% (95% CI 0.41-0.86, P=0.005) between 2016 and 2019, while hospital costs did not significantly change (P=0.2). Of note, female patients had a higher risk of PE (OR 2.86 [95% CI 2.41-6.39]) and SE (OR 5.0 [95% CI 1.28-43.6]), while patients with multiple comorbidities had higher risks of major bleeding (P<0.001), mortality (P=0.031), longer hospital LOS (P<0.001) and increased treatment costs (P=0.073). Male patients had the most peculiar decrease in adverse discharge rate between 2016 and 2019: OR 0.45 [95% CI 0.27-0.77]. Significant differences in all outcomes were observed between male and female patients across US regions (Figure). Subgroup analyses confirmed that female patients had a prolonged LOS and higher risk of adverse discharge disposition than male patients. Conclusions LAAC has become a safer and more efficient procedure. Significant sex differences existed across US regions. Careful considerations should be taken when performing LAAC in female and comorbid patients.