Safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic day surgery for pulmonary nodules: a retrospective analysis based on propensity score matching

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic day surgery for pulmonary nodules. Methods: Clinical data of 523 patients with pulmonary nodule underwent robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University from January 2021 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, which including 223 males and 300 females, aged from 19 to 72 (54.0±11.7) years. Those patients were divided into the day surgery group (DSG) and inpatient surgery group (ISG) according to perioperative management methods. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1∶2) was performed according to the general baseline information, T stage of the tumor, surgery approach, and tumor position, and a total of 178 patients were finally included. Clinical outcomes of DSG were observed. The differences in incidence of postoperative complications, treatment-related costs and resource consumption between DSG and ISG were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed according to surgery method to evaluate the difference between DSG and ISG in lobectomy and sublobectomy. Results: In 81 cases DSG, eight patients were transferred to thoracic surgery ward, and the day surgery discharge rate was 90% (73/81). There was no statistically significant difference in incidence of postoperative complications between DSG and ISG (P=0.612). The length of stay after surgery, period of chest draining, average hospital cost, and drug cost of DSG were statistically significant lower than ISG, ((2.19±0.84) vs (4.74±1.81) days, (1.70±0.65) vs (3.45±1.85) days, (6.64±0.74) vs (8.29±0.97)×104 CNY, (0.35±0.07) vs (0.69±0.18)×104 CNY), respectively(all P<0.05). The drainage volume and VAS score at discharge in DSG and ISG group were(220.47±120.02) ml and(242.21±129.96) ml, 1.68±0.79 and 1.64±0.91, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). In subgroup analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in incidence of postoperative complications, drainage volume after surgery and VAS score at discharge between DSG and ISG both for lobectomy and sublobectomy patients. And the results of the length of stay after surgery, period of chest draining, and drug cost in DSG were also significantly lower than ISG (P<0.05). Conclusions: Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic day surgery for pulmonary nodule is safe and feasible, with the advantage of short length of stay after surgery, short period of chest draining, less average hospital cost and drug cost. There is no difference in incidence of postoperative complications between DSG and ISG.