Safety and efficacy of Rezūm™ in erectile dysfunction patients with and without an inflatable penile prosthesis[[es]]Seguridad y eficacia del sistema Rezūm® en pacientes con disfunción eréctil con y sin prótesis de pene inflable

Abstract

PurposeThis study evaluates the safety and efficacy of Rezūm™ in erectile dysfunction (ED) patients with and without an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). Materials and MethodsThis was a retrospective review of ED patients who underwent Rezūm™ by a single surgeon over 12 months. Patient age, presence of IPP, number of benign prostatic hyperplasia medications, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS Quality of Life Index (QOL), uroflowmetry maximum flow rate (Qmax), and uroflowmetry average flow rate (Qavg) before and after Rezūm™ were obtained. Independent two-sample T-tests were used to compare preoperative and postoperative characteristics between patients with and without an IPP. Linear regression was performed to identify factors associated with postoperative Qmax or Qavg. ResultsA total of 17 patients with ED who underwent Rezūm™ were identified, including 11 patients with an IPP. The median follow-up after Rezūm™ was 65 days. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics and clinical characteristics between patients with and without an IPP. Postoperative Qmax (10.9 mL/s vs 9.8 mL/s, p = 0.04) and Qavg (7.5 mL/s vs 6.0 mL/s, p = 0.03) were significantly higher in patients with an IPP compared to patients without an IPP. There were no factors associated with postoperative Qmax or Qavg on linear regression. Two patients without an IPP went into urinary retention, while no complications occurred in IPP patients. ConclusionRezūm™ is a safe and effective procedure to perform in ED patients, particularly those with an IPP. IPP patients may experience greater increase in uroflowmetry rate compared to ED patients without an IPP.