Safety and efficacy of catheter-directed thrombectomy without thrombolysis in acute pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

BackgroundThis meta-analysis aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of catheter-directed thrombectomy (CDT) without using adjunct thrombolysis as reperfusion therapy to manage intermediate and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE). MethodsA literature search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CiNAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted from inception to January 2024. Eligible studies reported more than 10 patients treated for acute PE with catheter-directed thrombectomy only, who were over 18 years of age. Primary endpoints were major bleeding, in-hospital mortality, and hemodynamic changes. ResultsEighteen studies (n = 803) were included for quantitative analysis. The pooled estimate of incidences of in-hospital mortality and major bleeding was 1.8 % (95 % CI 0.009, 0.027) and 2.1 % (95 % CI 0.011, 0.031) respectively. A pooled estimate reported a post-procedural increase in oxygen saturation and systolic blood pressure by 8.96 % (95 % CI: 3.54, 14.38) and 15.02 mmHg (95 % CI 6.35, 23.69) respectively. Post-procedural mean pulmonary artery pressure, right ventricle/left ventricle (RV/LV) ratio, and Miller score were reduced by 10.30 mmHg (95 % CI -14.94, −5.66), 0.29 (95 % CI -0.50, −0.08) and 8.09 (95 % CI -10.70, −5.47) respectively. ConclusionCDT without adjunctive thrombolysis may lead to improvements in hemodynamic outcomes and appears to exhibit favorable safety profiles. This meta-analysis provides a rationale for further research comparing CDT alone against using adjunct thrombolysis to determine optimal management strategies for intermediate to high-risk acute PE.