Abstract

Background: The upregulated expression of BET proteins is closely associated with the occurrence and development of hematological malignancies and solid tumors. Several BET inhibitors have been developed, and some have been in phase I/II of clinical trials. Here, the safety, efficacy, and pharmacodynamics of ten BET inhibitors currently in clinical trials were evaluated. Methods: We retrieved and reviewed published reports on the clinical trials of twelve BET inhibitors including AZD5153, ABBV-075, BMS-986158, CPI-0610, GSK525762, OTX-015, PLX51107, INCB054329, INCB057643, FT-1101, CC-90010, and ODM-207 for patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors and summarized their published target genes. Results: In the monotherapy of BET inhibitors, the most common and severe (grade ≥3) hematological adverse events (AEs) are thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia. The most common non-hematological syndromes are diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, dysgeusia, and decreased appetite, while the most severe AE is pneumonia. Additionally, T max of these BET inhibitors was between 0.5–6 h, but the range for T 1/2 varied significantly. According to published data, the rates of SD, PD, CR and PR were 27.4%, 37.6%, 3.5%, and 5.7%, respectively, which is not very satisfactory. In addition to BRD4, oncogene MYC is another common target gene of these BET inhibitors. Ninety-seven signaling pathways may be regulated by BET inhibitors. Conclusion: All BET inhibitors reviewed in our study exhibited exposure-dependent thrombocytopenia, which may limit their clinical application. Moreover, further efforts are necessary to explore the optimal dosing schemes and combinations to maximize the efficacy of BET inhibitors.

Highlights

  • Acetylation of lysine residues is an important post-translational modification for DNA binding proteins, especially histone (Verdin and Ott, 2015)

  • The Bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) proteins consist of four members: BRD containing BRD2, BRD3, BRD4, and BRDT (Lovén et al, 2013)

  • The extra terminal (ET) domain is necessary for the recruitment of the components of the transcriptional complex, while the C-terminal domain (CTD) is responsible for the recruitment of positive elongation factor (P-TEFb)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Acetylation of lysine residues is an important post-translational modification for DNA binding proteins, especially histone (Verdin and Ott, 2015). The BET proteins consist of four members: BRD containing BRD2, BRD3, BRD4, and BRDT (Lovén et al, 2013) They all harbor two bromodomain binding domains BD1 and BD2 at their N-terminal site as well as an extra terminal (ET) domain, while BRD4 and BRDT contain an additional C-terminal domain (CTD) (Hsu and Blobel, 2017). Among these domains, BD1 and BD2 contain an amino acidic hydrophobic pocket, which is the binding site of the acetylated lysine residues on histone (Alqahtani et al, 2019). The safety, efficacy, and pharmacodynamics of ten BET inhibitors currently in clinical trials were evaluated

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call