Abstract
Automotive interiors materials, like plasticized polyvinyl chloride (pPVC) synthetic leathers (SLs), require additives for improving their flame behavior. The preferred flame retardant (FR) used in pPVC is antimony trioxide (Sb2O3, ATO), though the use of antimony poses several issues, for both human health and the environment, related to its extraction, processing, and use. In order to investigate alternatives to ATO in high‐performance pPVC SLs, various commercial FRs have been selected and tested in a typical, highly plasticized formulation. These additives have been used either alone or combined to evaluate synergistic effects. Samples have been tested to assess mechanical properties, thermal stability, and flame resistance. Data have been compared with those of neat pPVC and a foil with 2 phr of ATO. Several FRs are effective in improving the flame response compared with neat pPVC, without compromising the other properties, in detail calcium hypophosphite and mixtures containing zinc hydroxystannate (ZHS). Finally, aluminum hydroxide and ZHS (ATH + ZHS) yields the cheaper among the alternatives here proposed, even though higher than ATO (+193%) whose price/performance ratio is difficult to overcome. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 59:2488–2497, 2019. © 2019 Society of Plastics Engineers
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
