Abstract

With the operationalisation of lockdowns and restrictions on public gatherings, education systems across the entire globe were confronted with an urgent need to reconsider alternative forms of teaching, learning and assessment. Some institutions in developing countries were especially hard-hit by the shift owing to inadequacies in training and infrastructure because unlike their more developed counterparts who had already made inroads into adopting online technologies, some institutions in the developing world had no such technologies in place. As such, the shift to online learning was rushed and somewhat a “learning on the job” experience for students and educators. While remote online teaching, learning and assessment are novel experiences for many higher education institutions, developing countries are incessantly presented with many challenges, particularly when safeguarding academic integrity. Invigilated assessments, which are often considered more secure, are not an option given the current situation, thus detecting any cheating would be significantly challenging. As a result, this study examined assessment security in the digital domain and critically evaluated the practices to safeguard academic integrity in developing countries across three Southern African universities, including associated challenges. Underpinned by the pragmatist paradigm, the study employed a mixed-methods research approach that utilised in-depth qualitative and quantitative data from university managers, lecturers and students to investigate how academic integrity is safeguarded in the advent of online learning. Our findings revealed that although the transition to online learning and assessment was abrupt, higher education institutions have generated creative strategies to secure and ensure the continuity of learning and assessment. Such strategies include administering several versions of the same examination, as well as the use of “text-matching” software to detect the originality of work done by students. Based on the findings of the study, it was recommended that to guarantee the authenticity of online assessment, institutions must ensure that assessment practices relate to real-world needs and the context in which students can apply acquired knowledge.

Highlights

  • The COVID-19 outbreak posed a serious threat to several sectors, including the higher education sector

  • Given that emergency remote learning in the case of the COVID-19 outbreak is not the same as online learning, the technology resources for content delivery may be similar (Eaton, 2020; Hodges et al, 2020), thousands of students and educators were suddenly found working in online environments with little to no training, expertise, and motivation (Eaton, 2020)

  • To gather data on strategies used to enhance assessment security in the digital domain, we asked participants, “What strategies have been used at your institution to enhance security in online assessment?” Findings from the qualitative phase revealed that the transition to online learning and assessment was abrupt, higher education institutions have generated creative strategies to ensure the continuity of learning and assessment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The COVID-19 outbreak posed a serious threat to several sectors, including the higher education sector. Investigating the higher education sector’s ability to adapt to changing circumstances is more important than ever to handle the uncertainty and developing scenarios connected with the pressing problem of the COVID-19 pandemic and consequent lockdowns, especially in developing countries. Given that emergency remote learning in the case of the COVID-19 outbreak is not the same as online learning, the technology resources for content delivery may be similar (Eaton, 2020; Hodges et al, 2020), thousands of students and educators were suddenly found working in online environments with little to no training, expertise, and motivation (Eaton, 2020). Educators who had never taught online before had little or no opportunity to think about how assessment in e-learning contexts differs from how students are assessed in face-to-face settings (Eaton & Turner, 2020). Many educators had little or no opportunity to examine the implications of these decisions in terms of academic integrity and how it could be safeguarded in the face of emergency remote teaching and learning

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call