Abstract

There is a growing concern that the voices of athletes, and in particular, athletes from equity-deserving groups, are unaccounted for in the development and advancement of Safe Sport initiatives. The lack of consideration of the needs and experiences of diverse groups is concerning, given the existing literature outside the context of sport indicating that equity-deserving individuals experience more violence. As such, the following study sought to understand how equity-deserving athletes interpret and experience Safe Sport. Grounded within an interpretive phenomenological analysis, semi-structured interviews were used to understand how athletes with marginalised identities conceptualise and experience Safe Sport. Seven participants, including two Black male athletes, two White, gay male athletes, one Middle Eastern female athlete, one White, female athlete with a physical disability and one White, non-binary, queer, athlete with a physical disability, were asked to conceptualise and describe their experiences of Safe Sport. The findings revealed these athletes perceived Safe Sport as an unrealistic and unattainable ideal that cannot fully be experienced by those from equity-deserving groups. This interpretation was reinforced by reported experiences of discriminatory comments, discriminatory behaviours and systemic barriers, perpetrated by coaches, teammates, and resulting from structural aspects of sport. The findings draw on the human rights literature to suggest integrating principles of equity, diversity and inclusion are fundamental to safeguarding equity-deserving athletes.

Highlights

  • In response to several high-profile cases of athlete abuse (Kennedy and Grainger, 2006; Kelly, 2013; Masters and Veselinovic, 2018), many sport organisations have committed to developing policies and programmes to advance what has come to be known as Safe Sport1 (Gurgis and Kerr, 2021)

  • This study explored the equity-deserving athletes’ perspectives, experiences of and recommendations for advancing Safe Sport

  • The findings indicated that participants’ perspectives and experiences of Safe Sport differed from those of White, male, heterosexual and able-bodied athletes, and that Safe Sport initiatives, which focus on abuse prevention, inadequately recognise or address discrimination and microaggressions as forms of violence

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In response to several high-profile cases of athlete abuse (Kennedy and Grainger, 2006; Kelly, 2013; Masters and Veselinovic, 2018), many sport organisations have committed to developing policies and programmes to advance what has come to be known as Safe Sport (Gurgis and Kerr, 2021). International Olympic Committee (1997) on harassment and abuse defined Safe Sport as ‘an athletic environment that is respectful, equitable and free from all forms of non-accidental violence to athletes’ The Child Protection in Sport Unit in the United Kingdom (Boocock, 2002), which existed long before other Safe Sport organisations, uses the term safeguarding, defined as: Protecting children from maltreatment; preventing impairment of children’s mental and physical health or development; ensuring that children grow up in circumstances consistent with the provision of safe and effective care; and taking action to enable all children to have the best outcomes. The Child Protection in Sport Unit in the United Kingdom (Boocock, 2002), which existed long before other Safe Sport organisations, uses the term safeguarding, defined as: Protecting children from maltreatment; preventing impairment of children’s mental and physical health or development; ensuring that children grow up in circumstances consistent with the provision of safe and effective care; and taking action to enable all children to have the best outcomes. (Department of Education, 2018, p. 7)

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call