Abstract

Evacuations are an important aspect of emergency planning. Many persons with special needs could reach a safe area on their own or with assistance by other people around, if evacuation planning and guidance considered them. The so-called self-rescue is crucial for safe evacuation, as fire services and other first-responders need some time to arrive at the scene. In general, people should find the conditions to arrive at a safe area on their own. In many buildings and infrastructures today, self-rescue is difficult for persons with special needs, e.g. wheelchair users. Sometimes it appears that designers and fire safety engineers only think of “average”, healthy and agile people in evacuations. But for safe and effective evacuations, different groups of people and their needs have to be considered. The paper suggests a top 10 list of requirements for safe evacuation and improvement of self-rescue from a psychological point of view. Universal Design or Design for All in evacuation has become more relevant in recent times, since accessibility as a political goal has made it possible for persons with special needs to participate more easily in public life. Nonetheless, regulations focus on how people enter a building but not on how to evacuate safely. Preparing for safer evacuations requires knowledge about different occupant groups and their needs. Requirements for different phases of evacuations are discussed and their implications for simulation and modelling, e.g. the potential impact of physiological requirements. The need for a multi-method approach to gather and integrate data, factors to foster safe evacuations, just as practical and design requirements are included. When self-rescue is not possible, assisted evacuation will rely on good leadership fostering social motivation. Last but not least, implementing design for all will help everyone to evacuate safely.

Highlights

  • Universal Design or Design for All in evacuation has become more relevant in recent times, since accessibility as a political goal has made it possible for persons with special needs to participate more in public life

  • This paper reports recent results from the authors’ studies on evacuation from subway stations [8, 9] and from previous research projects reaching back to 2008 [e.g. reported in [10,11,12,13]

  • In research and practical planning, round-table workshops seem a good method to bring together different perspectives and develop a shared understanding: What is relevant for persons with special needs? Which of their requirements can be usefully implemented in simulation models? How to deal with conflict between different groups, e.g. tactile guidance systems on the floor for blind people may be a problem for persons using walking aids - at the same time fire safety regulations often focus single needs without considering the side effects of actions for other impairments

Read more

Summary

Background

This paper reports recent results from the authors’ studies on evacuation from subway stations [8, 9] and from previous research projects reaching back to 2008 [e.g. reported in [10,11,12,13]. Studies (see [9, 11, 15]) aimed to describe requirements for the design of evacuation routes and evacuation guidance. This included identifying different groups of subway users with special needs, describing their route choice behavior, their strategies in evacuations as well as their knowledge, e.g. knowledge about fires, how they would behave in case of a fire, and what they need to be able to evacuate safely [16]

Top 10 Requirements for safe evacuations
Understand
Authenticate
Consider as relevant
Response
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call