Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation Using an Anchor Versus Suture-Capturing Device: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare rates of persistent gluteal and posterior thigh pain, procedural efficacy, and postoperative complications at 1 year after sacrospinous ligament fixation using either an anchor-based or suture-capturing device. This prospective cohort study evaluated outcomes 1 year after operation in patients previously enrolled in a randomized controlled trial comparing an anchor-based versus suture-capturing device for sacrospinous fixation. Symptom scores were evaluated via Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 7. Pain was evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale. Composite surgical failure was defined as prolapse beyond the hymen or C-point greater than one half down the vagina, vaginal bulge symptoms, or a need for prolapse retreatment via surgery or pessary management. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were performed. Forty three (21 anchors, 22 sutures) of the original 47 patients (91%) returned for follow-up. The mean follow-up time was 15.4 months, age was 69 years old, body mass index was 30, and preoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage was 2.7. No patients reported significant increase in pain at sacrospinous fixation site above baseline, and there was no significant difference in posterior thigh or gluteal pain on the side of fixation compared with baseline in the anchor-based or suture-capture groups (-0.2 ± 0.9 and -0.5 ± 1.6, respectively, P = 0.719). Two patients demonstrated surgical failure (anchor group) due to bulge symptoms (P = 0.233). The devices similarly improved Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (-71.0 ± 45.5 vs -66.3 ± 64.4, P = 0.652) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 7 (-40.6 ± 62.4 vs -26.4 ± 65.7, P = 0.768) scores. Persistent gluteal or posterior thigh pain and surgical failure is uncommon 12 months after sacrospinous fixation and was not associated with the type of fixation device.