Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the use of non-crosslinked acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy by analyzing clinical outcomes and patient-satisfaction surveys.Materials and Methods: Two hundred and eleven patients underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) between January 6, 2012, and December 31, 2017. Each patient had her pelvic-floor measurements diagrammed with the POP-Q [Quantification] system using the interactive tool provided by the American Urogynecologic Society. The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), used to make comprehensive assessments of women with urogynecologic problems, were mailed to all patients. If responses were not received, the patients were contacted by telephone. Patients who were not reached by either mail or telephone had their charts individually reviewed to extract the information. Trained surveyors scored the PFDI-20 and the PFIQ-7 questionnaires. The de-identified data were analyzed for patient satisfaction and outcomes. This information was obtained by a review of patient charts at 4-week postoperative and annual examinations; any phone calls with complaints and/or problem office visits were noted. Biopsies from the sacrocolpopexy area were taken if a patient had another incidental gynecologic procedure unrelated to the prolapse or at the time of repeat sacrocolpopexy for POP and the paraffin cell block was sent to McGowan Institute for Tissue Regeneration.Results: One hundred and five patients responded to the survey. Charts were completed for 106. The majority of interviewed patients stated that they were doing a “little better” or “much better” (77/88; 87.5%). The third-quartile PFDI-20 score was 93 with a median of 60 and the PFIQ-7 score was 43 with a median of 29. Five patients underwent reoperations (4.76%). The most-common postoperative complaint was overactive bladder symptoms, followed by vaginal discharge. Histology showed either a lack of regenerative healing tissue at the failure site or good results showing neovascularization and a presence of connective and ligamentous tissue around the matrix. No intense fibrosis or neoplastic formation was reported.Conclusions: A non-crosslinked ADM patch can be a good alternative to synthetic polypropylene mesh in patients undergoing sacrocolpopexy for POP.

Highlights

  • This article is about a follow-up study to the original one published in the Journal of Gynecologic Surgery in 2017, by the current author, entitled ‘‘Sacrocolpopexy: AModification of the Standard Laparoscopic Procedure to Adopt [sic] to the Properties of a Biologic Matrix Patch.’’1Previous results showed a 9-patient postoperative PelvicFloor Distress inventory (PFDI-20) average of 25.47 – 29.68.Patient-reported satisfaction with postsurgical outcomes rangedDepartment of Obstetrics/Gynecology, Women’s Hospital Saint Joseph East, Dr Karon’s Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery & Research Center, Lexington, KY.a Magdalene Karon and Somu Chatterjee, 2019; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc

  • This study was conducted to evaluate the use of non-crosslinked acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy by analyzing clinical outcomes and patient-satisfaction surveys

  • Biopsies from the sacrocolpopexy area were taken if a patient had another incidental gynecologic procedure unrelated to the prolapse or at the time of repeat sacrocolpopexy for POP and the paraffin cell block was sent to McGowan Institute for Tissue Regeneration

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This article is about a follow-up study to the original one published in the Journal of Gynecologic Surgery in 2017, by the current author, entitled ‘‘Sacrocolpopexy: AModification of the Standard Laparoscopic Procedure to Adopt [sic] to the Properties of a Biologic Matrix Patch.’’1Previous results showed a 9-patient postoperative PelvicFloor Distress inventory (PFDI-20) average of 25.47 – 29.68.Patient-reported satisfaction with postsurgical outcomes ranged. This article is about a follow-up study to the original one published in the Journal of Gynecologic Surgery in 2017, by the current author, entitled ‘‘Sacrocolpopexy: A. Modification of the Standard Laparoscopic Procedure to Adopt [sic] to the Properties of a Biologic Matrix Patch.’’1. Previous results showed a 9-patient postoperative Pelvic. The current study evaluated clinical outcomes, satisfaction, and postoperative events in patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy with non-crosslinked acellular dermal matrix (ADM) between the years 2012 and 2017. Sacrocolpopexy is considered the ‘‘gold standard’’ procedure for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). By aligning the original axis of the vagina and providing a strong apical support, sacrocolpopexy restores the original anatomical position before the POP occurred. Open sacrocolpopexy via a laparotomy has been performed successfully for many years but was considered more invasive than the transvaginal approaches

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call