Abstract
The study of rituals raises the issue of the formulation of the sacred‐profane distinction. If sacred and profane are considered as mutually exclusive, this distinction is not applicable to Melanesian societies. However, a re‐reading of Durkheim's work reveals an alternative formulation derived from two distinct forms of hierarchy: gradation and encompassment. Dumont's analysis of the caste system permits us to reconcile these two forms, which then appear as governed by a unified hierarchy of values. This reformulated, hierarchic definition of the sacred‐profane relation is tested on the Orokaiva case. Finally, it allows us to draw certain comparative conclusions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
