Abstract

This article offers a new perspective on the century-old discussion of sacral rulers in the history of religions generally, and pre-Christian Scandinavian religions specifically, namely the application of a cultural evolutionary theoretical framework based on the work of Robert N. Bellah. In doing this, the article opens the possibility of wider typological comparisons within this paradigm and suggests a nuancing of Bellah’s typology with the addition of the category of ‘chiefdom religion’. This is utilised in the main part of the article, which features a comparison between the figure of the sacral ruler in pre-Christian Scandinavian and pre-Christian Hawaiian religions through an analysis of: 1) the position of the ruler in society, cult, and ideology; 2) the societal structure in which these religions are found; 3) the idea of a ruler sacrifice; 4) incestuous relationships and their ideological implications; and, finally, 5) the idea of a double rulership. Following this comparison, the perspectives in and the usefulness of cultural evolutionary theories in the history of religions are briefly evaluated.

Highlights

  • This article offers a new perspective on the century-old discussion of sacral rulers in the history of religions generally, and pre-Christian Scandinavian religions namely the application of a cultural evolutionary theoretical framework based on the work of Robert N

  • This article offers a new perspective on the discussion through the application of a cultural evolutionary theoretical framework

  • Through the application of cultural evolutionary theory certain characteristics within pre-Christian Scandinavian religions, culture, and society relating to the figure of the ruler will be revealed, examined, and compared with pre-Christian Hawaiian religions to demonstrate the usefulness of cultural evolutionary theory as a comparative and analytical tool in the creation of models for reconstruction in the history of religions

Read more

Summary

Theory and method

The specific cultural evolutionary theory which I will apply in this article was proposed by the recently deceased (July 2013) American sociologist of religion, Robert N. In recent years the idea of categorically accepting or refuting the existence of a sacral kingship has been replaced by reflections for or against This has been prompted by the increasing methodological awareness within the field (Nygaard 2013, 137–9), which has been a catalyst for research, especially within the history of religions, that has explored the possibility of some form of sacral or religious ruler-figure in pre-Christian Scandinavia (Schjødt 1990; 2010; Steinsland 1991; 2000; Sundqvist 2002; 2012) – research which I will draw on throughout this article’s analysis.

The position of the ruler
Societal structure
Ruler sacrifice
Incestuous relationships
Double rulership
Freyr fertility peace reges winter
Conclusion
28 Bibliography
Literature
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call