Abstract

Rotation-Invariant Face Detection (RIPD) has been widely used in practical applications; however, the problem of the adjusting of the rotation-in-plane (RIP) angle of the human face still remains. Recently, several methods based on neural networks have been proposed to solve the RIP angle problem. However, these methods have various limitations, including low detecting speed, model size, and detecting accuracy. To solve the aforementioned problems, we propose a new network, called the Searching Architecture Calibration Network (SACN), which utilizes architecture search, fully convolutional network (FCN) and bounding box center cluster (CC). SACN was tested on the challenging Multi-Oriented Face Detection Data Set and Benchmark (MOFDDB) and achieved a higher detecting accuracy and almost the same speed as existing detectors. Moreover, the average angle error is optimized from the current 12.6° to 10.5°.

Highlights

  • Face recognition [1,2,3] has played an important role in the field of computer vision

  • Most facial recognition systems are designed with a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model, such as the Multitask Cascaded Convolutional Networks (MTCNNs) [4], Cascading networks [5,6,7], Fully Convolutional Networks (FCNs) [8,9,10,11], Feature Pyramid Networks (FPNs) [12,13], and Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNs) [14,15]

  • The network is constructed by FCN

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Face recognition [1,2,3] has played an important role in the field of computer vision. DFEN utilizes a normal convolutional model to detect the rotation-invariant face from coarse to fine It changes the bounding box regression by introducing angle prediction processed by a Single Shot Detector (SSD). DFEN introduces an angle module to the network to extract the face angle features Their method achieves excellent accuracy in face detection, the detecting speed is not satisfactory due to the size of the SSD, which is almost 100 Megabytes.

Architecture Search
Overall Processing
Center Cluster Calibration
SACN in First Stage
SACN in Second Stage
SACN in Third Stage
Benchmark Datasets
Accuracy Comparison
15 FPS 67 FPS 20 FPS 63 FPS 60 FPS
Ablation Experiment
Conclusions and Future Works
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call