Abstract

Threat-conditioned cues are thought to capture overt attention in a bottom-up process. Quantification of this phenomenon typically relies on cue competition paradigms. Here, we sought to exploit gaze patterns during exclusive presentation of a visual conditioned stimulus, in order to quantify human threat conditioning. To this end, we capitalized on a summary statistic of visual search during CS presentation, scanpath length. During a simple delayed threat conditioning paradigm with full-screen monochrome conditioned stimuli (CS), we observed shorter scanpath length during CS+ compared to CS- presentation. Retrodictive validity, i.e., effect size to distinguish CS+ and CS-, was maximized by considering a 2-s time window before US onset. Taking into account the shape of the scan speed response resulted in similar retrodictive validity. The mechanism underlying shorter scanpath length appeared to be longer fixation duration and more fixation on the screen center during CS+ relative to CS- presentation. These findings were replicated in a second experiment with similar setup, and further confirmed in a third experiment using full-screen patterns as CS. This experiment included an extinction session during which scanpath differences appeared to extinguish. In a fourth experiment with auditory CS and instruction to fixate screen center, no scanpath length differences were observed. In conclusion, our study suggests scanpath length as a visual search summary statistic, which may be used as complementary measure to quantify threat conditioning with retrodictive validity similar to that of skin conductance responses.

Highlights

  • Pavlovian threat conditioning is widely used across species to investigate associative learning about aversive events

  • For Experiments 1–2 and 4, Skin conductance responses (SCR), PSR, and HPR were reported previously. These measures significantly differed between conditioned stimuli (CS)+/CS- in all experiments, with the exception of SCR in Experiment 4 (t(12) = 2.03, p = .065, g = 0.53), which was notably based on a small sample of 13 participants due to missing data

  • We investigated the impact of threatconditioned cues on summary statistic of gaze patterns, scanpath length, and optimized this measure as an index of human threat conditioning

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pavlovian threat conditioning ( termed fear conditioning) is widely used across species to investigate associative learning about aversive events. In an instructed saccade task after conditioning, saccades were faster towards CS+ (Schmidt, Belopolsky, & Theeuwes, 2015), and CS+ attracted more (erroneous) saccades (Schmidt et al, 2015; Hopkins, Helmstetter, & Hannula, 2016) It is currently unclear whether overt attention depends on uncertainty of the upcoming US (Hogarth, Dickinson, Austin, Brown, & Duka, 2008; Koenig et al, 2017) or on its aversive value (Wise, Michely, Dayan, & Dolan, 2019). We based this on a metric of visual search, namely scanpath length. Because reliability is only meaningful if the measure is valid in the first place (Cronbach & Meehl, 1955), and strongly depends on the presence of interindividual variability in learning the CS-US association (Brandmaier et al, 2018), we do not use it as a development criterion

Participants
Experimental setup
Data and code availability
Results
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call