Abstract

The interest in saccadic IOR is funneled by the hypothesis that it serves a clear functional purpose in the selection of fixation points: the facilitation of foraging. In this study, we arrive at a different interpretation of saccadic IOR. First, we find that return saccades are performed much more often than expected from the statistical properties of saccades and saccade pairs. Second, we find that fixation durations before a saccade are modulated by the relative angle of the saccade, but return saccades show no sign of an additional temporal inhibition. Thus, we do not find temporal saccadic inhibition of return. Interestingly, we find that return locations are more salient, according to empirically measured saliency (locations that are fixated by many observers) as well as stimulus dependent saliency (defined by image features), than regular fixation locations. These results and the finding that return saccades increase the match of individual trajectories with a grand total priority map evidences the return saccades being part of a fixation selection strategy that trades off exploration and exploitation.

Highlights

  • The effect of inhibition of return (IOR) was first described by Posner & Cohen [1]

  • We investigated the spatial, temporal and functional properties of saccadic inhibition of return

  • With respect to spatial properties, we find more 1-back and 2back return saccades than expected from the distribution of saccade angles and amplitudes and relative angles and amplitudes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When (covert) attention is attracted by a peripheral cue, reaction times to a subsequent probe stimulus in the same location depend in an intriguing way on the temporal offset between cue and probe: When the probe follows the cue at temporal offsets shorter than ,225 ms, fast responses are observed. A central crosshad to be fixated continuously, so the inhibitory influence at long stimulus intervals pertained to covert attention. The fixation duration before a return saccade is on average longer compared to a saccade that continues in the same direction as the previous one. This study aims at a step towards an understanding of these conflicting results by further characterizing the properties of return saccades and by providing a novel view of IOR during viewing of pictures of natural and urban scenes

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.