Saccade-related neurons in the primate fastigial nucleus: what do they encode?

Abstract

The cerebellar fastigial oculomotor region (FOR) and the overlying oculomotor vermis (OV) are involved in the control of saccadic eye movements, but nature and function of their saccade-related neuronal signals are not fully understood. There is controversy in at least two major aspects: first, lesion studies in OV/FOR reported eye-position-dependent dysmetria-with FOR lesions, centripetal saccades became more hypermetric than centrifugal saccades-suggesting that the cerebellum may compensate for orbital mechanics. However, single-unit studies failed to reveal corresponding eye-position dependencies in FOR saccade-related discharge patterns. Second, some single-unit studies reported precise correlation between burst and saccade duration in the FOR. However, others stated that FOR bursts were only weakly related to saccade properties. In an attempt to resolve these discrepancies, we recorded single FOR units in monkeys that made horizontal saccades (16 degrees ) from different starting positions. Sampling saccades of one fixed amplitude and application of an objective, computer-based burst-detection-routine allowed us to correlate burst parameters (onset latency, peak latency, peak amplitude, number of spikes, duration) and kinematic properties of individual saccades. FOR bursts were found to start and peak earlier and exhibit higher peak burst amplitudes for faster than for slower saccades of the same amplitude. While these correlations between FOR bursts and saccade properties were statistically significant for a minority of approximately 20-25% of individual units, the same effects were also predominant in the remainder of the neuronal sample and statistically significant on the population level. Neuronal activity was not significantly modulated by eye position itself. However, reflecting differences in saccade velocities but not an actual influence of eye position per se, FOR bursts for centripetal and centrifugal saccades exhibited subtle but systematic differences, which closely paralleled, and hence probably explain, the eye-position dependency of deficits observed after FOR inactivation. Our findings indicate that FOR signals reflect much of the kinematic properties of the saccade. Moreover, they are consistent with the idea that the FOR output is purposefully modified according to these kinematic properties to maintain saccadic accuracy.