Abstract

Background Asthmatic patients receiving inhaled corticosteroids often take frequent add-on therapy with albuterol despite on-demand prescription. We wished to evaluate trough methacholine airway hyper-responsiveness (the primary outcome) following regular treatment with racemic salbutamol and levosalbutamol compared to placebo, in steroid treated asthmatics stratified according to beta-2 adrenoceptor 16 genotype. Methods We performed a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, triple crossover trial comparing 2 weeks of regular therapy with inhaled racemic salbutamol (200µg qid); levosalbutamol (100µg qid); or placebo on methacholine PC20 6 hours post dose in 30 persistent asthmatics (15 homozygous Arg16 and Gly16) receiving inhaled corticosteroids. Results There was no rebound worsening of trough airway hyper-responsiveness to methacholine after chronic exposure to either racemic (p=0.53) or levosalbutamol (p=0.84) compared to placebo; nor between genotypes - as doubling dilution (dd) difference in methacholine PC20 from placebo (Figure 1): salbutamol/Arg16= 0.36dd (95% CI: –0.43, 1.15); salbutamol/Gly16=0.01dd (95% CI: –0.47, 0.49); levosalbutamol/Arg16=–0.01dd (95% CI: –0.89, 0.87); levosalbutamol/Gly16=0.28dd (95% CI: –0.22, 0.77). Both active treatments improved morning PEF in Gly16 (p=0.04) but not Arg16 patients (p=0.50); while evening PEF improved in both Gly16 (p Conclusions Chronic exposure to either racemic or levosalbutamol added to inhaled corticosteroids did not cause rebound worsening of airway hyper-responsiveness at trough compared to placebo; with no difference seen between beta-2 adrenoceptor 16 genotypes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.