Abstract

Introduction: ICU admission and prolonged length-of-stay (PLOS) is associated with increased resources need, healthcare cost and poorer outcomes for the patients. There is a paucity of predictive parameters to assess ICU admission and PLOS in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) patients taking dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Methods: A retrospective chart review was done for all consecutive adult patients between 2015-2020 who presented with NVUGIB on DAPT (aspirin, clopidogrel; aspirin, ticagrelor; aspirin, prasugrel) to Allegheny Health Network and underwent endoscopy. Patients who had DAPT held as per ASGE guidelines were excluded from the study. An exploratory analysis was done to assess predictive ability of four GI bleeding risk scores [Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS), AIMS65, qSOFA and Rockall] to predict ICU admission and prolonged Length of Stay (PLOS). PLOS was defined as ≥5 days based on institutional experience in NVUGIB patients. Logistic regression was used to identify variables independently associated with ICU admission and PLOS and estimate their odds ratios and 95% CI. P value < 0.05 was considered as the level of significance. Results: 75 patients (M: F 53:22), mean age±S.D. 70.1±11.2 years, meeting inclusion criteria were included for final analysis. 22/75 (29%) patients had ICU admission. AIMS65 and qSOFA predicted ICU admission (Table 1A). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of AIMS65 and qSOFA for ICU admission has been shown in Table 1B. Median LOS was 6; IQR=8 (range 2-43) days. 47/75 (63%) patients had PLOS. GBS and AIMS65 predicted PLOS (Table 1A). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of GBS and AIMS65 for PLOS has been shown in Table 1B. Conclusion: AIMS65 is a simple scoring system, originally developed to predict mortality in patients with UGIB. This study provides preliminary evidence for the use of AIMS65 to predict longer LOS and ICU admission in patients with NVUGIB taking DAPT which may help resource allocation and prognostication. However, the study needs to be validated in a larger study population before it can be used in clinical practice.Table 1.: Comparison of Inpatient Outcomes of NVUGIB Patients.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call