Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
BackgroundPatients with severe mental illness (SMI) are characterized by an unhealthy lifestyle, which contributes to the widening mortality gap with the general population [1] Changing high levels of sedentary behaviour (SB) and lack of physical activity (PA) is very challenging [2–4].Effective interventions improving lifestyle in inpatients are still limited, while of all patients with SMI, the hospitalized do have the worst health status.We implemented a MUltidisciplinary Lifestyle Enhancing Treatment for Inpatients with SMI (MULTI), mainly including a daily structure, tailored sports- and work-related activities, attention to dietary habits, psycho-education and participation of staff. It involved a culture change which was implemented based on a ‘change-from-within’-principle, using multidisciplinary* cooperation within the current context and resources of inpatient mental healthcare.* Psychiatrists, activity coordinators, nurse practitioners, dietician and nurses, some of them trained as lifestyle coach.AimEvaluate changes in physical and mental health and functioning after 18 months compared to treatment as usual (TAU).MethodsObservational controlled design including long-term hospitalised inpatients with SMI. We used data from routine screening and a previous cross-sectional study (2013), supplemented by a repeated accelerometer measurement (2015). Patients were included if they received no other intervention related to lifestyle within 18 months after the start of MULTI and if baseline accelerometer data was available. Patients were excluded from analysis if they had a lack of data after 18 months because they (1) were deceased, (2) moved or were discharged from the hospital or (3) had insufficient follow-up accelerometer data.Measures:Accelerometer-measured physical activity (PA) [ActiGraph GT3X+]Metabolic health [weight, abdominal girth, blood-pressure and -levels and metabolic syndrome criteria]Psychotic symptoms [PANSS-r]Quality of life (QoL) [EQ-5D & WHOQoL-Bref]Psychosocial functioning [HoNOS]Analysishierarchical multilevel regression using change-scores, correcting for baseline outcome-value, age, diagnosis and baseline illness-severity.ResultsWe had sufficient data of 65 patients receiving MULTI and 49 within TAU.Significant (p < 0.05) improvements in total PA (B = 0.5), moderate-to-vigorous PA (B = 1.8%), weight (B = -4.2kg), abdominal girth (B = -3.5cm), systolic blood-pressure (B = -8.0mmHg), HDL-cholesterol (B = 0.1mmol/l) and psychosocial functioning on sums score (B = -3.6), impairment (B = -0.7) and social problems (B = -3.0). No improvements were observed in PA/metabolic health within TAU. Patients receiving MULTI had higher odds to recover from ≥1 metabolic syndrome criterion (OR = 2.06). There was no significant effect on psychotic symptoms. QoL improved significantly in both groups.DiscussionStriking results for clinical practice, as much effort and attempts on lifestyle within inpatients with SMI failed to achieve desired improvements, especially in longer term.A turnaround in inpatient mental healthcare: the negative trend of deterioration within these patients can be stopped, relevant parameters can even be positively reversed and negative effects are absent.TAU does not improve physical health A sustainable solution towards a healthier lifestyle in inpatients with SMI at our fingertips, as MULTI was implemented using current context and resources.
Highlights
Coercive psychiatric care in Sweden has been criticized by the UN and alternative therapies are called for upon from Swedish politicians
Preliminary results from the first five interviews suggest that the action plan facilitates shared decision making and encourages safety measures, and compulsory inpatient care can be avoided
Preliminary findings suggest that the Early Signs Action Plan seemed to be a useful tool to im-prove patient participation and reduce the need for compulsory inpatient care when exacerbations occur
Summary
S407 cognitive training and/or adjunctive rehabilitation were excluded. A boxscore analysis of predictor variables was conducted and the quality of the predictor evidence was assessed. Results: Of 417 records extracted, 37 articles considering 1,499 overlapping CRT participants (2,423 full sample) were included in the final synthesis. CRT trial arm size averaged 41.64 participants. 72 distinct predictors of cognitive response were identified, with an average 4.89 predictor variables considered across an average 3.95 cognitive domains per article. Discussion focused on the 20 predictors examined a minimum 3 times. Discussion: Few of the currently examined predictors of cognitive response to CRT are significant when examined as a systematic review. The influence of age was the most frequently examined predictor, with a majority of articles finding no association. Training task improvement or “learning potential” was the most notable cross-domain predictor of cognitive outcome, though this was limited to three articles and warrants further investigation. Nils Sjöström*,1, Maria Genberg, Alexander Marteleur, Eva Andreasson, Margda Waern3 1Sahlgrenska University Hospital; 2Region Västra Götaland; 3Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
