Abstract
Introduction: PDAC is an aggressive malignancy that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment to provide the patient with the best chance of long-term survival. Patients who have an imaging-confirmed solitary pancreatic mass generally undergo a EUS-guided biopsy for histological confirmation of the diagnosis. We describe a rare case of solitary intramural gastric metastases discovered on surveillance EGD prior to EUS-guided biopsy. Case Description/Methods: 63-year-old male with a past medical history of hypertension, chronic pancreatitis, and tobacco use presented with 2 months history of epigastric pain, and 5lbs weight loss. He denied jaundice, loss of appetite, pale-colored stools, or generalized itching. Initial CT abdomen showed a 2.7cm x2.6cm mass in the pancreas body with associated proximal pancreatic duct dilatation and atrophy, suspicious of pancreatic neoplasm. Ca19-9 was 111, and CEA was 1.1. No evidence of metastasis was found on the CT chest/abdomen. EUS-guided biopsy of the mass was scheduled. At the beginning of the procedure, a surveillance EGD was performed which showed a 2cm submucosal, non-circumferential mass in the gastric fundus (Figure a). EUS was performed next which confirmed a 2.1 cm intramural mass in the gastric fundus originating from the muscularis propria (Figure b), and a 3.9cm x 3.8cm mass in the pancreatic body with invasion into superior mesenteric vein, splenic vein, and splenoportal confluence with no noted arterial involvement (Figure c). EUS-guided fine needle biopsy of both lesions was obtained using separate needles. Histopathology from both biopsies demonstrated invasive adenocarcinoma, histomorphologically similar and suggestive of a pancreatic primary. This changed the staging of the patient from borderline resectable to metastatic and he was referred for palliative chemotherapy. Discussion: Isolated gastric metastasis of PDAC is extremely rare, and documented cases in the literature are from a prior diagnostic biopsy that created a seeding tract. Our case highlights 2 major points: 1) Though rare, isolated intramural gastric metastasis can occur and can be missed on cross-sectional imaging. 2) Currently there is no consensus or guideline that mandates an EGD prior to EUS. In this case, this significant finding which changed the staging, treatment, and prognosis of the patient could have been missed with an oblique viewing EUS scope. At our center, we routinely perform EGD prior to EUS. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the utility of this practice.Figure 1.: a: EGD demonstrating 2cm submucosal, non-circumferential mass in the gastric fundus. b: EUS demonstrating a 2.1 cm intramural mass in the gastric fundus originating from the muscularis propria. c: EUS demonstrating 3.9-cm x 3.8-cm mass in the pancreatic body with invasion into the superior mesenteric vein, splenic vein, and splenoportal confluence with no noted arterial involvement.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.