Abstract

Introduction: Tradipitant is a novel NK-1 receptor antagonist studied in diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis for short-term relief of nausea. This report presents the pooled analysis from 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (VP-VLY-686-3301 and VP-VLY-686-2301) assessing the efficacy of tradipitant in relieving symptoms of gastroparesis. Methods: N=342 idiopathic and diabetic gastroparesis patients with delayed gastric emptying, moderate to severe nausea were included in the pooled ITT (Intent-to-Treat) population. Subjects were randomized to 85mg tradipitant twice a day (n=175) or placebo (n=167) and endpoints were assessed at Week 4. Nausea was assessed with the 5-point Gastroparesis Core Symptom Daily Diary (GCSDD). Overall gastroparesis symptom improvement was evaluated with the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) and Overall Patient Benefit (OPB) scales. Sensitivity analyses were performed to control for confounders. Results: In a pooled analysis of double-blind subjects in the ITT population of Study 1 and Study 2, tradipitant demonstrated a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in average nausea at week 4 (-1.15 for tradipitant v. -0.85 for placebo, P=0.0138). Significant improvement was seen in the number of nausea free days (20.96% improvement for tradipitant v. 12.52% for placebo, P=0.0085). Tradipitant also showed improvement in other gastroparesis symptoms as measured by the GCSI total score (-0.99 for tradipitant v. -0.76 for placebo, P=0.0265). Responder rates for PGI-C were 79.3% on tradipitant versus 69% on placebo at week 4 (P value = 0.036). For the Overall Patient Benefit, more patients improved on tradipitant versus placebo with 85.3% v. 71.2% at week 4 (P= 0.002). Sensitivity analysis adjusting for drug compliance confirmed the PK population (tradipitant blood levels ≥ 140ng/mL) in the pooled data set (n=284). In the pooled PK Population, tradipitant significantly improved average nausea at week 4 with -1.38 for tradipitant v. -0.85 for placebo (P=0.0001). Conclusion: Pooling the data provided an opportunity to analyze a much larger data set, increase statistical power, and confirm results and subpopulations from the 2 separate studies. In the pooled analysis, we observed a clinically meaningful and significant effect on change of nausea severity at week 4. Improvements were also seen across core gastroparesis symptoms and overall measures of gastroparesis.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.