Abstract

BackgroundThe ability to predict the sensory feedback of self-generated stimuli against incoming sensory information is of importance to distinguish internal from external stimuli and is associated with sensory attenuation. Furthermore, it has been proposed that deficits in sensory attenuation could contribute to clinical symptoms of schizophrenia, including hallucinations and delusions, involving potential deficits in corollary discharge. The current study examined the hypothesis whether sensory attenuation is present in participants at clinical high–risk (CHR) for psychosis.MethodsSixty-four CHR-participants and 32 healthy controls were presented with auditory stimuli during two experimental conditions: 1) In a passive condition, participants were presented with ripple sounds (40HZ with 2000ms duration, 83db) and responded to flat sounds (1000HZ with 2000ms duration,83db) with the right-index finger and 2) In an active condition, the ripple sounds were elicited by a button press with the right-index finger every 4s. MEG-data were acquired with a 248-magnetometers whole-head MEG system (MAGNES 3600 WH, 4-D Neuroimaging) at a sampling rate of 1017Hz. We focussed on the M100 response during the passive and active conditions at sensor- and source-level. A LCMV beamforming approach was employed for source reconstruction and virtual channels in primary auditory cortex and the left superior temporal cortex were used further analysis of sensory attenuation effects. Condition and group effects were tested with a cluster-based nonparametric test implemented in Fieldtrip with a window of interest for the M100 component between 120ms-150ms.ResultsThere was a significant decrease (P =0.009) in the amplitude of M100 component in the active vs. passive conditions across groups at both sensor- and source-level. Interaction-effects revealed that that sensory attenuation was significantly reduced in auditory cortices in the CHR group vs controls (P=0.032).DiscussionThe current results highlight that sensory attenuation can be studied with ASSR-paradigms and that both primary auditory and superior temporal cortices underlie this effect. Moreover, our current findings suggest that sensory attenuation is impaired in CHR-participants, suggesting the possibility of impaired corollary discharge processes as a potential biomarker for the early diagnosis and detection of schizophrenia.

Highlights

  • The aberrant salience hypothesis of schizophrenia proposes that symptoms such as paranoia arise when behavioural salience is attributed to neutral stimuli

  • The ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) presented 28% of aberrant functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (75% was hyperactivity)

  • Given the relatively small number of participants in this analysis, we expect to find broader and clearer group differences of neural mechanisms during pursuit with larger sample sizes

Read more

Summary

Background

Both schizophrenia patients and highly schizotypal individuals are known to perform worse in smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) as compared to healthy controls with low levels of schizotypy. Individuals with high total schizotypy levels showed reduced activation in motion processing and other visual areas during SPEM than low schizotypal controls. Results: At the level of performance, we found an interaction between target frequency and group for the root mean square error (RMSE) of eye position (p = .026) This result indicates greater performance detriments from low to high frequency in HPS, as compared to the other two groups. Overall activations during pursuit across the entire sample were found in brain regions known to be part of the pursuit network, i.e. frontal and supplementary eye fields, lateral geniculate nucleus, and visual cortex including V5 None of these regions displayed activation differences between groups. Given the relatively small number of participants in this analysis, we expect to find broader and clearer group differences of neural mechanisms during pursuit with larger sample sizes

Methods
Findings
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.