Abstract

Introduction: Preservation solutions are required for organ viability in deceased donor liver transplantation (LT). However, their role in live donor LT (LDLT) has not been standardized. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of selected liver grafts flushed with cold normal saline (NS) with Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate (HTK) solution. Methods: One hundred consecutive adult recipients who underwent right lobe LDLT from February 2020 to December 2020 at Gambat, Pakistan were studied. Recipients were assigned to receive “no preservation solution” (cases/non-HTK group; n=50) based on shorter CIT & no back Table reconstruction work or “HTK group” (controls; n=50) requiring standard back Table reconstruction. Various outcomes, including early graft dysfunction (bilirubin, transaminases, and INR), postoperative complications (biliary & vascular), hospital stay, and one-year survival, were compared between the two groups. The direct cost was also reported. Results: Demographics and clinical characters were comparable in the two groups. Comparing cases vs. controls, mean bilirubin, ALT, AST, and INR on the 7thpostoperative day were similar in the two groups. 5(10%) cases and 4(8%) controls developed EAD(p=0.72). Post-LT complications (biliary leak 2% in cases vs. 0 in control), strictures (12% in cases vs. 16% in controls), hepatic artery thrombosis (4% vs. 2%) and portal vein thrombosis (0 vs. 2%) were equally distributed. Mean hospital stay (11.02 + 2.63 and 12.06 + 3.68 days) and 30-day mortality (8% vs 8%) were also comparable in two groups. Finally, 1-year survival (92% vs 90%) based on Kaplan-Meier analysis was also comparable (p-value:0.71). The cost of using a non-HTK-based approach was much lesser than the HTK solution. (Figure) Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first innovative report on avoiding preservative solutions in LDLT recipients. We found that EAD including liver function tests; post-operative complications (biliary and vascular), 30 days’ mortality, and 1-year survival were comparable in the two groups. We also found that avoiding the preservative solution has an impact on saving direct costs. (Table). In our study, the postoperative complications and the overall one-year survival rate in the non-preservation group (92%) and the HTK group (90%) were equal and matched with other studies from the region. From an economic perspective, we also found that avoiding the use of preservation solutions is very attractive.Figure 1.: Kaplan-Meier showing a comparable survival rate in non-HTK and HTK groups at 1-year post-liver transplantation Table 1. - Recipient demographics, clinical characteristics, laboratory values, and complications in study groups Recipient demographics, clinical characteristics, laboratory values, and complications in study groups. Variables non-HTK group (n=50) HTK group (n=50) p-value Recipients Age(years) 39.18+11.69 36.84+6.77 0.224 Gender 44(88%) 46 (92%) 0.741 Male 6(12%) 4 (08%) Female BMI(kg/m2) 22.46±4.29 22.84±4.24 0.657 Etiology Viral 47 (94%) 45 (90%) NASH 2 (04%) 1 (02%) Alcoholic 00 (00%) 00 (00%) Budd Chiari 00 (00%) 1 (02%) PBC 00 (00%) 1 (02%) Wilson 1 (02%) 1 (02%) PSC 00 (00%) 1 (02%) HCC 11 (22%) 02 (04%) 0.015 Co-Morbidities DM 4 (08%) 2 (04%) 0.67 HTN 00 (00%) 3 (06%) 0.24 CVD 00 (00%) 00 (00%) 0.00 CTP score 0.59 A 3 (06%) 1 (02%) B 9 (18%) 9 (18%) C 38 (76%) 40 (80%) MELD-Na 19.53±5.51 20.88±4.75 0.19 Operation time (min) 537±70.66 534.60±60.72 0.85 Blood loss(ml) 1622±317.70 1512±300.775 0.07 Hospital stays(days) 11.02±2.63 12.06±3.68 0.10 Mean Post-operative labs (at day 07) Total bilirubin (mg/dL)INR (IU/L)ALT (IU/L)AST (IU/L) 2.96 ± 2.97 3.06 ± 3.24 0.91 1.44 ± 0.24 1.39 ± 0.18 0.82 186.79 ± 144.95 137.69 ± 97.28 0.05 119.69 ± 133.45 93.78 ± 85.65 0.26 Complication EAD 4 (8%) 5(10%) 0.727 PNF 00 1 (2%) 0.315 ACR 3(6%) 4 (8%) 0.695 HAT 2 (4%) 1(2%) 0.558 Sepsis 5 (10%) 4 (8%) 0.727 PVT 00 1 (2%) 0.315 Biliary complicationsStrictureLeak 6 (12%)1 (2%) 8 (16%)00 0.5640.315 Clavin-dindo Grade>III 11 (22%) 13 (26%) 0.64 30-day Mortality 4 (8%) 4 (8%) 1.00 1-year mortality (excluding 1st month) 00 1 (2%) 0.315 BMI: body mass index; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; HTN: hypertension; CVD: cardiovascular disease; CTP: Child Turcotte Pugh; INR: international normalized ratio; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; EAD: early graft dysfunction; PNF: primary non-function; ACR: acute cellular rejection; HAT: hepatic artery thrombosis; PVT: portal vein thrombosis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call