Abstract

BackgroundBelief in conspiracy theories (i.e., a subset of false narratives in which the ultimate cause of an event is believed to be due to a malevolent plot by multiple actors working together) is a widespread and stable aspect of contemporary public opinion. Given such findings, researchers have sought to understand the factors that make someone more or less likely to adopt conspiracist beliefs. More specifically, scholars have focused primarily on social and differential aspects, as well as possible psychopathological elements. These endeavours have led to reports of significant associations between schizotypal facets (odd or magical thinking and, to a lesser extent, ideas of references) and the endorsement of conspiracist beliefs. However, one limitation of extant findings is the assumption that the afore-mentioned relationships are ultimately direct; that is, schizotypal facets are directly associated with conspiracist beliefs, rather than influenced by mediating processes. To overcome this limitation, the present study sought to replicate previous findings by confirming the relationships between components of schizotypy and conspiracist beliefs. Second, this study examined the mediating influence of cognitive processes on this relationship.MethodsAn international online sample of 411 women and men completed measures of schizotypal components (i.e., odd beliefs or magical thinking and ideas of reference), conspiracist beliefs, and cognitive processes (i.e., need for cognition, analytic thinking, and cognitive insight).ResultsThrough path analysis, results indicated associations between both schizotypal facets and conspiracist beliefs in the present sample. Further, there was evidence for the association between analytic thinking and conspiracist beliefs, and between cognitive insight and conspiracist beliefs. Indeed, cognitive insight was found to mediate the association between odd beliefs or magical thinking and ideas of reference with conspiracist beliefs. In addition, analytic thinking provided a mediating link to conspiracy ideation for odd beliefs or magical thinking, this was not found with ideas of reference. Despite an association between odd beliefs or magical thinking and need for cognition, this did not extend to conspiracist beliefs.DiscussionIn summary, the results of this study supported the association between schizotypal components and conspiracist beliefs. However, they also extend previous research by suggesting that cognitive processes mediate this link. That is, although a direct link between these variables may be tenable, it is also important to consider the possible ways in which schizotypy influences cognitive processes, which in turn have an effect on conspiracist beliefs. From a practical point-of-view, this highlights possible intervention routes for reducing conspiracist beliefs, either by targeting schizotypal traits indirectly or cognitive factors directly. While this research addresses schizotypy, patients with psychotic disorders and those with an at-risk mental state have also been shown to have reasoning biases. Therefore, future research, in relation to the clinical spectrum, should consider not only reasoning biases, but an outcome of conspiracy beliefs.

Highlights

  • Resolving the definition, heterogeneity and validity of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders remains a challenge, including the distinctiveness of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder

  • Overall cognition was measured with the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) composite and social cognition with Theory of Mind, emotion perception and attribution bias tasks

  • The aim of this study is to investigate the relation of Early onset schizophrenia (EOS) and formal thought disorder in schizophrenia

Read more

Summary

Background

Dopamine and serotonin neurotransmission relies mostly on the action of four factors: serotonin and dopamine transporters (SERT and DAT) and enzymes monoaminooxidase A (MAO-A) and catechol-O-mehtyltransferase (COMT). Results: Factor analysis of PANSS scale retained all 30 items and identified 5 separate factors (aggressive/impulsive, affective/depressive, cognitive, negative and positive symptoms). Analysis of CDSS scale revealed 2 separate factors (depression and suicidality). Significant PANSS variables were those of aggressive/impulsive and negative symptoms, while suicidality was the only significant CDSS variable. When testing the influence of investigated gene polymorphisms on the variable of total PANSS score and five distinct factors we did not establish significant findings regarding four variables: total PANSS score, positive, cognitive and affective/depressive symptoms. While that is in line with majority of other investigations, SERT promoter polymorphism and COMT Val158Met gene polymorphism have been previously associated with depressive and positive symptoms. SERT and MAO-A polymorphisms separately had a significant effect on the variable of aggressive/impulsive symptoms, which has not been

Findings
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call