Abstract
The acquisition of the components of paired-associate learning was examined in relation to the two-stage model of Underwood and Schulz and the symmetry model of Asch and Ebenholtz. Paired-associate learning was considered to include four components: forward association, backward association, stimulus learning, and response learning. Learning of paired-associate material was hypothesized to be a function of the meaningfulness of the material. Components should be learned differently with high and low meaningful material. It was concluded that the Underwood and Schulz two-stage model of paired-associate learning is appropriate primarily for the learning of low meaningful material, whereas the symmetry model of Asch and Ebenholtz more accurately describes the learning of high meaningful material.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.