Abstract

It is a well-known fact that budgetary allocations need to be based on a just formula for balanced service delivery in the modern world. This paper describes the intergovernmental formula designed for Rwanda in 2003 to allocate grants from the central to local governments (LGs). First, the previous criterion, the Local Authority Budget Support Fund, was reviewed. This was followed by a literature review and field visits. Finally, the specifications of the mathematical model are described, followed by the proxy selection, data analysis, econometric evaluation, and estimations used in the study. In 2003, data analysis revealed that LGs had low fiscal capacities and ubiquitous fiscal needs. These were proxied by mean own source revenues and expenditure needs, respectively, in the proposed formula. The difference between the two was taken as the mean fiscal gap. This formula corrected the inherent weaknesses in the previous transfer system. It proposed weighting parameters to determine subnational transfer entitlements. Additionally, it constructed and applied welfare poverty and fiscal gap indices that captured the behavior of LGs in terms of wellbeing, fiscal needs, and revenue capacity for the first time in Rwanda. The study recommendations were entirely adopted by the government. The formula was used to allocate unconditional grants from the central government to LGs to improve service delivery and reduce poverty. The study also highlights that any successful transfer formula design depends on how the following are determined—the transfer pool, weights, proposed variables, and proxy indices—and how they enter the model.

Highlights

  • TO THE STUDYThis article examines the origins of the intergovernmental fiscal equalization formula proposed for Rwanda in 2003 and provides an econometric evaluation of it using 2003 data

  • This paper describes the intergovernmental formula designed for Rwanda in 2003 to allocate grants from the central to local governments (LGs)

  • While designing the formula, we had to rely on secondary data from various sources that were collated into a central data set of fiscal decentralization data (FDD)

Read more

Summary

BACKGROUND

This article examines the origins of the intergovernmental fiscal equalization formula proposed for Rwanda in 2003 and provides an econometric evaluation of it using 2003 data. As part of its reforms, the government introduced a mix of grants that were technically unsound, as discussed elsewhere in this article. These were conditional grants, unconditional subsidies, equalization or common share transfers, and delegated funds.. Discussions on the effectiveness of these transfer variants are ubiquitious in the literature; for instance, Bird and Smart [3] offer a detailed description. These were the precursor initiatives that underpinned the transfer system reforms of that period.

░ 2. METHODOLOGY
Data Related Issues
Study Limitations
Inherent Weaknesses of the Previous System
District Mean Revenues
District Mean Expenditures
Central Government Transfers and Entitlements7
Mean Fiscal Gap
Features of the Designed Transfer System
The Study’s Contribution to Knowledge and the Literature
Mathematical Construct of the Proposed Transfer Formula
CONCLUSIONS AND CAVEATS
░ REFERENCES
Findings
96. Canada

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.