Abstract

The general interest in the dihydroxylation of olefins by means of transition metal catalysts prompted us to study the oxidation of ethene by rutheniumtetraoxide, a well-known active catalyst. Different mechanistic pathways on the singlet and triplet potential energy surface were investigated by density functional theory calculations (B3LYP) using different combinations of ECPs (Hay–Wadt, Stuttgart/Dresden 1997) and basis sets (6-31G(d), 6-311+G(d,p)). We find that the reaction follows a (3+2) addition pathway on the singlet surface, favored by 22 kcal/mol in activation energy over a (2+2) cycloaddition pathway. Complexes of RuO 4 with donor substituents like amines are significantly less stabilized compared to the osmiumtetraoxide case, which is in good agreement with experimental results. The RuO 4·NH 3 complex also reacts via a (3+2) singlet pathway and shows a 5 kcal/mol lower barrier, while stabilizing the ruthenate intermediate by 13 kcal/mol.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.