Abstract

The scientific approach presented in this article is based on the understandingof social capital and corporate culture as intersecting organizational phenomenahowever irreducible to each other. At the same time corporate culture is understoodinstrumentally and it is considered as a factor in the social capital formation, development and using process mediating its organizational and managerial effects. This doesnot negate the fact of complex iterative relations between them but allows to place theemphasis correctly both theoretical and practical, emphasizing the more fundamentaland comprehensive nature of social capital directly arising from the laws of socialinteraction and developing regardless of the purposeful management efforts to form asingle corporate culture.The analysis of various studies of social capital in Russia and abroad characterizingthe level of generalized trust in Russia as low and noting the multidirectional dynamicsbetween different types of social capital which are not typical for developed countries.These differences are interpreted in terms of differences in social relations types underlyingsocial capital: affiliation, hierarchy and exchange. From this point of view the high levelof declared institutional trust (with a certain degree of assumption) can be interpreted asa manifestation of the rational (“calculation”) mechanism of social capital constructionin modern Russian society. The conclusion about insufficient account in foreign scientistsof social, cultural and spiritual components researches is made.The analysis of the problems that have a negative impact on modern Russian societyin the process of social capital formation at the micro, meso- and macrolevels is made.The main problems are the lack of social unity and the spread of the Russian version ofindividualism associated with severe problems of survival and increasing the level ofinterpersonal and institutional distrust.

Highlights

  • E analysis of various studies of social capital in Russia and abroad characterizing the level of generalized trust in Russia as low and noting the multidirectional dynamics between di erent types of social capital which are not typical for developed countries

  • Ese di erences are interpreted in terms of di erences in social relations types underlying social capital: a liation, hierarchy and exchange

  • E analysis of the problems that have a negative impact on modern Russian society in the process of social capital formation at the micro, meso- and macrolevels is made

Read more

Summary

Introduction

E analysis of various studies of social capital in Russia and abroad characterizing the level of generalized trust in Russia as low and noting the multidirectional dynamics between di erent types of social capital which are not typical for developed countries. Что, по нашему мнению, вполне логично, поскольку именно он распространил понятие социального капитала на уровень всего общества. Если принять во внимание различие между типами социальных отношений, лежащих в основе социального капитала: аффилиации, иерархии и обмена.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.