Abstract

The article examines the political views and practices of Russian liberals in the early twentieth century. Russia’s political destiny of this period directly depended on building constructive relations between the authorities and society. Liberal ideas had a significant impact on the educated public. At the same time, the constructive cooperation between the liberals and the government was the most important condition for the possibility of application of these ideas in domestic political practice. The article examines the political experience of the two largest liberal political parties in Russia – the Cadets and the Octobrists. The author comes to the conclusion that the Russian liberal politician of the early twentieth century could not get out of the role of an idealist oppositionist. He was incapable of recognizing the existing realities and the need for political compromises, which were often perceived as a sign of impotence or immorality. The liberals perceived themselves as the only force capable of bringing Russia to the right, «civilized» path. In the opinion of the liberals, this path was inevitable, therefore, under any circumstances, the liberal movement should have retained its leading role. In the spring of 1917, the liberal opposition was able to defeat its historical enemy (autocracy), but retained power for a very short time. The slaughter of the state machine, which the liberals themselves did not intend to preserve, led them to defeat. Thus, the state was the only guarantor of the existence of a liberal movement in Russia.

Highlights

  • Политическая судьба России начала прошлого века напрямую зависела от выстраивания конструктивных отношений власти и общества

  • Russia's political destiny of this period directly depended on building constructive relations between the authorities and society

  • Liberal ideas had a significant impact on the educated public

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Политическая судьба России начала прошлого века напрямую зависела от выстраивания конструктивных отношений власти и общества. Как считал будущий глава Временного правительства кн. Находящийся на государственной службе, хотя бы и общеполезной, в конечном счете приносит вред народу уже тем, что усиливает правительственную власть. При этом они рассматривали себя основными выразителями ее интересов – причем в целом, а не отдельных групп или классов, за которые боролись иные партии.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.