Abstract

AbstractThe article contains a comparative analysis of the demographics, economy, and environment of three Russian macroregions and four Russian Arctic regions in order to determine strategic areas for a more sustainable development and implementation of the relevant concept. The article provides reasons for choosing two indicator groups to assess the territories using the systemic, comprehensive, and qualimetric methodological approaches and their respective theoretical principles. The first group includes performance indicators of Russian national projects. The second group contains annual government statistical data. The comparative assessment results based on an additive rank show that the Far Eastern Macroregion and Chukotka Autonomous Okrug have the worst demographic and economic situation, and the North-Western Macroregion, Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, and Murmansk Oblast have the worst environmental situation. This ranking distribution will help develop goals and stage-by-stage improvement plans for the macro-environments and their respective funding from the relevant national projects and federal budget.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call