Abstract

‘The nineteenth century, which prided itself upon the invention of steam and evolution’, Bertrand Russell wrote in an early essay, ‘might have derived a more legitimate title to fame from the discovery of pure mathematics’ (1901a, 366). Russell believed — and he was not alone in thinking this — that the discovery of pure mathematics was essentially a matter of finding out what is involved in mathematical reasoning. It is eminently reasonable to think that mathematical reasoning should be a matter of logic. But it was far from self-evident at the time Russell composed the essay. In the forms in which it existed before the late nineteenth century, formal logic had very few, if any, genuine applications. Insofar as one was concerned with discovering what was involved in mathematical reasoning, one could therefore set traditional Aristotelian logic aside, for it was simply irrelevant.KeywordsMathematical ReasoningEpistemic LogicismMathematical UnderstandingMathematical TruthLogical EmpiricistThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.