Abstract

Claims made on Salman Rushdie’s behalf about his use of language are commonplace, and often occur as variations on a standard refrain: Rushdie gives a new voice to India; he creates a language which captures in a dramatic fashion the semiological complexities of Indian vernaculars; his “bilingualism is different from that of all his predecessors”; his use of texts ranging from the Qur’an, The Thousand Nights and A Night , and Attar’s The Conference of the Birds to the Mahābhārata and The Ocean of the Rivers of Story , creates an insider’s world view not available, say, to a Forster or a Kipling, and so on. What has not been discussed at all seriously are the links between Rushdie and colonial discourses as well as his use of numerology. In locating one of the sources of Rushdie’s linguistic creativity in a colonial hobson-jobson, this essay suggests ways in which what has been referred to as Rushdie’s compact with the Western reader may be critically examined.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.