Abstract

We read with interest the recent article by Natarajan et al[1][1] regarding the outcome of treated patients admitted to their institution with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage during an 18-month period. The authors achieved excellent results in these patients and should be commended. We would like

Highlights

  • Their data do not strongly support their conclusion that the overall results of treatment for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage have improved significantly during the last decade

  • Logistic regression analysis was performed in an attempt to control for these pretreatment variables, at least 1 of them (HH) was a significant independent predictor of outcome

  • Despite these differences in important pretreatment variables favoring those in the clipped group, the patients with clipped aneurysms experienced longer stays in the intensive care unit, and significantly more of them developed vasospasm

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Their data do not strongly support their conclusion that the overall results of treatment for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage have improved significantly during the last decade. The conclusion that the outcome of patients with coiled and clipped aneurysms in their study was similar is technically accurate, and misleading. This study was not designed in a fashion that would allow a meaningful comparison of outcomes between the 2 groups: There are no conclusions that can be drawn from these data to guide clinical practice.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.