Abstract
AbstractTo gain a better understanding of the interactions between soil detachment, transport capacity, and residue cover, the USDA programmable rainfall simulator was used to erode plots created on established and newly created ridge‐till areas of <1% slope with and without residue cover. A control of conventional moldboard plow‐spring disk was also included. Results showed that for all treatments, ridge sideslope erosion was three to four times greater than total soil loss, suggesting that transport capacity was the limiting factor. For most runs no significant difference in soil loss was measured between ridges of different ages. The presence of residue decreased soil loss to one‐sixth or one‐seventh on older ridges and to one‐half on new ridges. Location of residue was more important than the total amount of residue. Residue placed only on the furrow bottom was as effective in reducing soil loss as residue placed over the entire ridge and furrow, while residue placed only on the ridge side‐slope did not reduce soil loss significantly from treatments without residue.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.