Abstract
Abstract Cartographic representations of landscape beauty face many pitfalls. Historically, significant problems have been associated with the use of surrogate variables to represent overall quality, as well as the general difficulties of two‐dimensional representation of views seen in elevation. Although current methods of landscape mapping appear to remain neutral on matters of qualitative judgement, and purport only to classify landscape types, these may be associated with problems of consistency and meaning. Future efforts might profitably be directed to analysing landscapes in terms of their probability of providing particular experiences and opportunities, and developing rules about people's appreciation of different landscape types
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
