Abstract
As the Presenter of Shakespeare's 2 Henry IV, Rumor troubles the too‐neat distinction between rumor and history. By embodying the conflict between narrative and display, Rumor transcends the split between aural and visual epistemologies and positions the Shakespearean history play in the “perpetual present,” a double temporality in which events happening for the first time nevertheless make use of the audience's prior historical and historiographic knowledge. The essay applies Rumor's lens to Falstaff, whose belly full of tongues echoes Rumor's tongue‐studded cloak, but the argument's implications range beyond individual character study to reveal Shakespeare's claim that history itself is imaginative. Rumor's creative potential allows Shakespeare to transcend historicity in order to emphasize the indeterminacy inherent not just in rumor, but in history as well.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.